Eric Edenfield v. State of Florida

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Supreme Court of Florida _____________ No. SC10-2146 _____________ ERIC EDENFIELD, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [March 15, 2012] PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Edenfield v. State, 45 So. 3d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding. It is so ordered. CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Direct Conflict of Decisions First District - Case No. 1D09-6554 (Duval County) Susan Z. Cohen and David M. Robbins of Epstein and Robbins, Jacksonville, Florida, for Petitioner Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Joshua Ryan Heller, and Thomas D. Winokur, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent Sonya Rudenstine, Gainesville, Florida, Michael Robert Ufferman, Tallahassee, Florida, and David Oscar Markus, Miami, Florida, on behalf of the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, as Amicus Curiae -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.