Frank Poer v. Calder Race Course, Inc.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC01-472 ____________ FRANK POER, et al., Petitioners, vs. CALDER RACE COURSE, INC., Respondent. [June 27, 2002] QUINCE, J. We initially accepted for review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in Poer v. Calder Race Course, Inc., 775 So. 2d 970 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), based upon express and direct conflict with the decision of Fifth District Court of Appeal in All Pro Sports Camp, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co., 727 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed. It is so ordered. WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, and LEWIS, JJ., concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal Direct Conflict Third District - Case No. 3D00-524 (Dade County) Edward R. Curtis of Curtis & Curtis, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida; and Bruce Botsford, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Petitioners Eric D. Isicoff and Teresa Ragatz of Isicoff & Ragatz, P.A., Miami, Florida, for Respondent William R. Amlong of Amlong & Amlong, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for The National Employment Lawyers Association, Florida Chapter, Amicus Curiae -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
