Judith Rose v. Norwegian Cruise Lines
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC01-1316 ____________ JUDITH ROSE, et al., etc., Petitioners, vs. NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINES LIMITED, etc., Respondent. [August 22, 2002] PER CURIAM. We originally accepted jurisdiction to review Norwegian Cruise Lines Ltd. v. Rose, 784 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2001), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), of the Florida Constitution. After further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this case is hereby dismissed. It is so ordered. SHAW, HARDING, WELLS, and PARIENTE, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, C.J., and LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., dissent. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal Direct Conflict Third District - Case No. 3D00-1012 (Dade County) Willliam M. Julian of Grossman & Goldman, P.A., Boca Raton, Florida; and Keith E. Hope, Key Biscayne, Florida, for Petitioners Curtis J. Mase and Catherine J. MacIvor of Mase & Gassenheimer, P.A., Miami, Florida, for Respondent Keith E. Hope of Crabtree & Hope, P.A., Key Biscayne, Florida, for Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers, Amicus Curiae -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
