Cedric Fraser v. Florida Department Of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC95506 ____________ CEDRIC FRASER, Petitioner, vs. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Respondent. [March 22, 2001] PER CURIAM We initially accepted review of the decision in Fraser v. Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, 727 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), based on alleged express and direct conflict under article V, section 3(b)(3), of the Florida Constitution. Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this case. It is so ordered. WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal Direct Conflict Fourth District - Case No. 4D97-2256 (Palm Beach County) Carl H. Lida, Plantation, Florida, for Petitioner Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Respondent Katherine Fernandez Rundle, State Attorney, and Israel Reyes, Assistant State Attorney, Miami, Florida; Law Office of Robert S. Glazier, Miami, Florida; and Jonathan Goodman of Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, P.A., on behalf of the City of Hollywood, Miami, Florida, for the Office of the State Attorney in and for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, on behalf of the Members of the South Florida Impact Task Force, Amicus Curiae -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.