David M. Pomerance v. Homosassa Special Water District

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC00-912 ____________ DAVID M. POMERANCE, et al., Petitioners, vs. HOMOSASSA SPECIAL WATER DISTRICT, etc., Respondent. [April 12 2001] PER CURIAM. We initially accepted review of the decision of the district court of appeal in Pomerance v. Homosassa Special Water District, 755 So. 2d 732 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on express and direct conflict with the decision in Lake County v. Water Oak Management Corp., 695 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 1997). Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed. It is so ordered. WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal Direct Conflict Fifth District - Case No. 5D98-2504 (Citrus County) Karen O. Gaffney, Inverness, Florida, for Petitioners Jack A. Moring of Myers and Moring, P.A., Crystal River, Florida; and Sidney F. Ansbacher of Upchurch, Bailey & Upchurch, P.A., St. Augustine, Florida, for Respondent Frank A. Shepherd, Miami, Florida, for Pacific Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.