Jim Lee Wade v. State of Florida

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC00-214 ____________ JIM LEE WADE, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [February 15, 2001] PER CURIAM. We initially accepted review of Wade v. State, 751 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), based on express and direct conflict with McKendry v. State, 641 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 1994). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause. It is so ordered. WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal Direct Conflict Second District - Case No. 2D98-00180 (Polk County) Jim L. Wade, pro se, Orlando, Florida, for Petitioner Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Erica M. Raffel, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Respondent -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.