City National Bank of Florida v. Miami-Dade Co.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC00-1764 ____________ CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, etc., Petitioner, vs. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, etc., Respondent. [November 8, 2001] PER CURIAM. We initially accepted review in Miami-Dade County v. City National Bank, 761 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), based on alleged express and direct conflict with the Second District Court of Appeal's decision in Hodges v. Division of Administration, 323 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Upon further consideration, however, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. Therefore, we dismiss review of this cause. It is so ordered. WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal Direct Conflict Third District - Case No. 3D99-2230 (Dade County) Thomas R. Bolf of Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Petitioner Robert A. Ginsburg, Miami-Dade County Attorney, and Thomas Goldstein, Assistant County Attorney, Miami, Florida, for Respondent -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
