Liliana Cahuasqui v. U.S. Security Insurance Co.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC00-1649 ____________ LILIANA CAHUASQUI, Petitioner, vs. U.S. SECURITY INSURANCE CO., Respondent. [September 26, 2001] PER CURIAM. We have for review U.S. Security Insurance Co. v. Cahuasqui, 760 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), based on apparent conflict with Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Pinnacle Medical, Inc., 753 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 2000). Upon further review we have determined that conflict does not exist and that there is no other valid basis for jurisdiction here. Accordingly, the petition for review was improvidently granted and is hereby dismissed. It is so ordered. WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal Direct Conflict Third District - Case No. 3D98-3337 (Dade County) Juan C. Montes of Lidsky, Vaccaro & Montes, Hialeah, Florida, for Petitioner Michael A. Nuzzo, Miami, Florida; and David B. Pakula of Fazio, Dawson, DiSalvo, Cannon, Abers, Podrecca & Fazio, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Respondent Barbara Green, Coral Gables, Florida, for The Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers, Amicus Curiae Frances F. Guasch of Luis E. Ordonez & Associates, Miami, Florida, for State Farm Insurance Companies and Florida Insurance Council, Amici Curiae Hinda Klein and Mara Shlackman of Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans & Abel, P.A., Hollywood, Florida, for Florida Defense Lawyers Association, Federated National Insurance Company, and Ocean Harbor Insurance Company, Amici Curiae -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
