Arthur P. Strahan v. Dewey L. Gauldin

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC00-1155 ____________ ARTHUR P. STRAHAN, etc., et al., Petitioners, vs. DEWEY L. GAULDIN, Respondent. [November 1, 2001] PER CURIAM. We initially accepted review of the decision of the district court of appeal in Strahan v. Gauldin, 756 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on express and direct conflict with another decision. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed. It is so ordered. WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal Direct Conflict Fifth District - Case Nos. 5D99-230 & 5D99-874 (Brevard County) Richard A. Sherman and Rosemary B. Wilder of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida; Scott Turner of Jack, Wyatt, Tolbert & Thompson, P.A., Melbourne, Florida; and Joseph G. Murasko of Dickstein, Reynolds & Woods, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Petitioners James I. Knudson and Jerry D. McGreal of Knudson & McGreal, P.A., Rockledge, Florida; and Edna L. Caruso of Caruso, Burlington, Bohn & Compiani, P.A., West Palm Beach, Florida, for Respondent -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.