Roderrick Justin Ferrell v. State of Florida

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC93127 ____________ RODERRICK JUSTIN FERRELL, Appellant, Cross-Appellee, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee, Cross-Appellant. [November 9, 2000] PER CURIAM. We have on appeal the judgments and sentences of the trial court imposing the death penalty upon Roderrick Justin Ferrell. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, ยง 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed below, we vacate the death sentences and reduce the sentences to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Roderrick Justin Ferrell pled guilty to one count of armed burglary, one count of armed robbery, and two counts of first-degree murder for the 1996 murders of Richard Wendorf and Naoma Queen. He was sixteen at the time of the crimes. The trial court sentenced Ferrell to death for the murders. Subsequently, in Brennan v. State, 754 So.2d 1 (Fla.1999), 1 this Court concluded that the imposition of a death sentence on a sixteen-year-old defendant constitutes cruel or unusual punishment in violation of article I, section 17 of the Florida Constitution. Accordingly, we affirm Ferrell s convictions, vacate his death sentences, and reduce the sentences to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. It is so ordered. SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur. WELLS, C.J., dissents. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND IF FILED, DETERMINED. A Notice and Cross-Notice of Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Lake County, Jerry Lockett, Judge - Case No. 96-1913-CF-JL James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Christopher S. Quarles, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee 1 We reject the State s argument and invitation to revisit this decision. -2- Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Kenneth S. Nunnelley, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant William O. Solms, Miami, Florida; and Kimball E. Gilmer, Charlottesville, Virginia, for The Rutherford Institute, Amicus Curiae -3-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.