Crescent Foundry Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. United States, No. 95-09 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2001)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on January 8, 1999.
Download PDF
Slip Op. 01 - 6 J U D G M E N T UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE Thomas J. Aquilino, Jr., Judge - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x CRESCENT FOUNDRY CO. PVT. LTD. et al., : Plaintiffs, v. : : Court No. 95-09-01239 : UNITED STATES, : Defendant. : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x The plaintiffs having interposed a motion pursuant to CIT Rule 56.2 for judgment upon the record compiled by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce ("ITA") sub nom. Certain Iron-Metal Castings From India: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 60 Fed.Reg. 44,849 (Aug. 29, 1995), aff'd in part, remanded in part sub nom. Crescent Foundry Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. United States, 20 CIT 1469, 951 F.Supp. 252 (1996), remand results aff'd, 21 CIT 696, 969 F.Supp. 1341 (1997), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 168 F.3d 1322 (Fed.Cir. 1998), remanded, 23 CIT , Slip Op. 99-5 (Jan. 8, 1999), second remand results remanded, 24 CIT , Slip Op. 00-21 (Feb. 18, 2000); and this court in slip opinion 00-148, 24 CIT (Nov. 9, 2000), having remanded to the ITA its remand results dated May 24, Court No. 95-09-01239 Page 2 2000 and stated to be pursuant to slip opinion 00-21 in order to eliminate the influence of rebates under India's International Price Reimbursement Scheme and Cash Compensatory Support program on the calculation of any subsidy under ยง80HHC of India's Income Tax Act; and the ITA having filed herein its Final Results of Redetermination on Remand dated December 11, 2000 and stated to be pursuant to slip opinion 00-148; and this court having reviewed those Final Results and not having received any comments thereon or opposition thereto from any party to this case; Now therefore, after due deliberation, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the ITA's Final Results of Redetermination on Remand dated December 11, 2000 be, and they hereby are, affirmed. Dated: New York, New York January 24, 2001 ________________________________ Judge
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
