Crescent Foundry Co. v. United States, No. 95-09 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1999)

 Annotate this Case

The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on November 9, 2000.
 The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on April 5, 2000.
 The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on February 18, 2000.
 The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on January 24, 2001.
 The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on July 18, 2002.

Download PDF
Slip Op. 99-5 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE CRESCENT FOUNDRY CO. PVT. LTD., NANDIKESHWARI PVT. LTD., CARNATION ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., KEJRIWAL IRON & STEEL WORKS, OVERSEAS IRON FOUNDRY PVT. LTD., RAGHUNATH PRASAD PHOOLCHAND LTD., R.B. AGARWALLA & COMPANY, RSI (INDIA) PVT. LTD., SERAMPORE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., SITARAM MADHOGARHIA & SONS PVT. LTD., SUPER CASTINGS (INDIA), TIRUPATI INTERNATIONAL (P) LTD., UMA IRON & STEEL CO. and KAJARIA IRON CASTINGS PVT. LTD., Plaintiffs, BEFORE: DiCarlo, Senior Judge Ct. No. 95-09-01239 v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY, INC., ALLEGHENY FOUNDRY CO., DEETER FOUNDRY, INC., EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS, INC., LEBARON FOUNDRY INC., MUNICIPAL CASTINGS, INC., NEENAH FOUNDRY CO., U.S. FOUNDRY & MANUFACTURING CO., and VULCAN FOUNDRY, INC., Defendant-Intervenors. ORDER In conformity with the order and opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, it is hereby 95-09-01239 Page 2 ORDERED that this action is remanded to the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration for further proceedings in conformity with the order and opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; and it is further ORDERED that Commerce shall file its remand results with the court within 45 days of the date of this order; and it is further ORDERED that any party contesting the remand results shall file comments with the court within 30 days of the remand results. SO ORDERED. Dominick L. DiCarlo Senior Judge Dated: New York, New York January 8, 1999

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.