Lisa Guffey v. Roslynn Mauskopf, No. 20-5183 (D.C. Cir. 2023)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on August 16, 2022.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Filed: January 13, 2023 No. 20-5183 LISA GUFFEY AND CHRISTINE SMITH, APPELLEES v. ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS, APPELLANT Consolidated with 20-5208 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:18-cv-01271) On Petition for Rehearing En Banc Before: SRINIVASAN, Chief Judge; HENDERSON**, MILLETT, PILLARD*, WILKINS, KATSAS, RAO, WALKER, CHILDS, and PAN, Circuit Judges 2 ORDER Appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc and the response thereto were circulated to the full court, and a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges eligible to participate did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED that the petition be denied. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Deputy Clerk * Circuit Judge Pillard did not participate in this matter. ** Circuit Judge Henderson would grant the petition for rehearing en banc. A statement by Circuit Judge Henderson, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, is attached. KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc: For the reasons explained in my panel dissent, which is hereby incorporated by reference thereto, Guffey v. Mauskopf, 45 F.4th 442, 452–62 (D.C. Cir. 2022) (Henderson, J., dissenting), I dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
