UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company v. Xavier Becerra (ORDER), No. 18-5326 (D.C. Cir. 2021)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on August 13, 2021.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 18-5326 September Term, 2021 1:16-cv-00157-RMC Filed On: November 1, 2021 UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company, et al., Appellees v. Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., Appellants BEFORE: Rogers, Pillard, and Walker, Circuit Judges ORDER Upon consideration of appellees’ petition for panel rehearing filed September 27, 2021, and the response thereto, it is ORDERED that the petition be denied. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion issued August 13, 2021, be amended as follows: (1) Slip Op., p. 7, lines 1-5: Delete: “We therefore reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment to UnitedHealth and its resulting vacatur of the Overpayment Rule and remand for the district court to enter judgment in favor of CMS.” and Insert in lieu thereof: “We therefore reverse the judgment of the district court vacating the Overpayment Rule and remand this case with orders to enter judgment in favor of Appellants, except with respect to the Overpayment Rule’s definition of ‘identified.’” (2) Slip Op., p. 49, lines 5-7: Delete: “We accordingly reverse the judgment of the district court and remand this case with orders to enter judgment in favor of Appellants.” and Insert in lieu thereof: “We accordingly reverse the judgment of the district court vacating the Overpayment Rule and remand this case with orders to enter judgment in favor of Appellants, except with respect to the Overpayment Rule’s definition of ‘identified.’” United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 18-5326 September Term, 2021 The Clerk is directed to issue the amended opinion and to amend the judgment issued August 13, 2021. The Clerk is further directed to issue the mandate forthwith. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: Page 2 /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Deputy Clerk
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
