SSC Mystic Operating Co. v. NLRB, No. 14-1045 (D.C. Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseMystic, operator of a nursing home, petitioned for review of the Board's order granting summary judgment against Mystic and rejecting, among other things, Mystic's arguments that the Hearing Officer had made substantive and procedural errors. The court deferred to the Board's reasonable interpretation that the lack of a quorum at the Board does not prevent Regional Directors from continuing to exercise delegated authority that is not final because it is subject to eventual review by the Board; substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusion that Mystic’s efforts to limit a supervisory employee’s effectiveness and its own anti-union campaign cancelled out the employee’s efforts on the Union’s behalf and preserved the environment necessary for a valid representation election; the Board was entitled to conclude that the election result challenged here was valid; and the Board’s ultimate conclusion as to the propriety of the election remains valid regardless of whether the employee was acting as an agent of the Union. Accordingly, the court denied Mystic's petition for review and granted the Board's cross-petition for enforcement.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.