Matt Sissel v. HHS, No. 13-5202 (D.C. Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on July 29, 2014.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 13-5202 September Term, 2014 1:10-cv-01263-BAH Filed On: August 7, 2015 Matt Sissel, Appellant v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al., Appellees BEFORE: Rogers, Pillard, and Wilkins, Circuit Judges ORDER Upon consideration of Appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc, the response thereto, and the full court’s deliberation during the poll on whether to call for a vote on the petition, the panel considered whether we should “sua sponte vacate [our] judgment and rehear[] the case.” Murphy v. I.R.S., 493 F.3d 170, 173 (D.C. Cir. 2007); cf. RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 13.3 (noting practice within the Courts of Appeals to “sua sponte consider[] rehearing”). Upon such further careful consideration, the panel reaffirms its opinion in Sissel v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 760 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2014), and, it is ORDERED that the rehearing be denied. FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: /s/ Ken Meadows Deputy Clerk
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
