USA v. Bryan Burwell, No. 06-3070 (D.C. Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on April 29, 2011.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals F OR T HE D ISTRICT OF C OLUMBIA C IRCUIT ____________ No. 06-3070 September Term 2011 04cr00355-01 04cr00355-02 04cr00355-03 04cr00355-05 04cr00355-06 04cr00355-08 Filed On: October 12, 2011 United States of America, Appellee v. Bryan Burwell, also known as Bush, Appellant -----------------------------Consolidated with 06-3071, 06-3073, 06-3077, 06-3083, 06-3084 BEFORE: Sentelle, Chief Judge, and Ginsburg, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Garland, Brown, Griffith, and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges ORDER Upon consideration of the petition of appellant Bryan Burwell for rehearing en banc and the brief of amicus curiae Federal Public Defender, the response thereto, and the vote in favor of the petition by a majority of the judges eligible to participate, it is ORDERED that the petition be granted. Case No. 06-3070 will be reheard by the court sitting en banc. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the portion of the court s April 29, 2011 judgment affirming the conviction and sentence of appellant Burwell be vacated. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the oral argument before the en banc court be heard at 9:30 a.m. on Monday, January 30, 2012. It is United States Court of Appeals F OR T HE D ISTRICT OF C OLUMBIA C IRCUIT ____________ No. 06-3070 September Term 2011 FURTHER ORDERED that, in addition to filing briefs electronically, the parties file 20 paper copies each of the briefs and the appendix, in accordance with the following schedule: Brief for Appellant November 14, 2011 Appendix November 14, 2011 Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Appellant November 14, 2011 Brief for Appellee December 14, 2011 Reply Brief for Appellant December 30, 2011 The briefs are to be limited to the question of mens rea regarding 18 U.S.C. ยง 924(c). Because the briefing schedule is keyed to the date of argument, the court will grant requests for extension of time limits only for extraordinarily compelling reasons. The briefs and appendix must contain the date that the case is scheduled for oral argument at the top of the cover. See D.C. Cir. Rule 28(a)(8). A separate order will issue regarding allocation of oral argument time. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: Page 2 /s/ Jennifer M. Clark Deputy Clerk
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
