TERENCE TEKOH V. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL, No. 18-56414 (9th Cir. 2023)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on January 15, 2021.
Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED AUG 4 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS TERENCE B. TEKOH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; DENNIS STANGELAND, Sergeant; CARLOS VEGA, Deputy, No. 18-56414 D.C. No. 2:16-cv-07297-GW-SK Central District of California, Los Angeles ORDER Defendants-Appellees, and LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; DOES, 1 to 10, Defendants. Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and WARDLAW and MILLER, Circuit Judges. Appellees’ motion to file a reply to Appellant’s response to the petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc (Dkt. 85) is DENIED. Pursuant to Circuit Rule 36-2(f), the memorandum disposition filed May 11, 2023, (Dkt. 78) is designated for publication. The superseding published disposition is filed concurrently with this order. Because the text of the published disposition remains unchanged from the previously filed memorandum disposition, further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will not be permitted. Appellees’ already-filed petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc (Dkt. 82) remains pending. IT IS SO ORDERED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
