Court Description: Per Curiam - Before Benton, Shepherd, and Stras, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. Defendant was found incompetent to stand trial under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 4241(d) on criminal charges for assaulting a probation officer and challenges the order committing him to the custody of the Attorney General for hospitalization under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 4246; the district court did not clearly err in finding, by clear and convincing evidence, that defendant was suffering from a mental disease or defect such that his release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to the property of another. [ September 18, 2018
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-1290 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. John Hunt lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield ____________ Submitted: September 6, 2018 Filed: September 20, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. John Hunt was found incompetent to stand trial under 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d) on criminal charges for assaulting a probation officer. He appeals an order committing him to the custody of the Attorney General for hospitalization under 18 U.S.C. § 4246. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms. Following a hearing, the district court1 found—by clear and convincing evidence—that Hunt was suffering from a mental disease or defect such that his release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to the property of another. See 18 U.S.C. § 4246. These factual determinations are not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Williams, 299 F.3d 673, 676-78 (8th Cir. 2002) (applying the clear-error standard to a determination that a prisoner was dangerous and eligible for commitment under section 4246). The commitment order is supported by the unanimous opinions of mental health professionals at the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri—where Hunt is presently confined for treatment. The district court’s order is also supported by Hunt’s independent psychological examiner, who determined that he suffers from a serious mental illness such that he meets the criteria for section 4246 commitment. The medical reports noted Hunt lacks insight into his mental condition; has a demonstrated history of medication noncompliance when on supervised release; has a history of substance abuse; and when not compliant with his prescribed treatment, he displays paranoid and delusional behaviors, and engages in the behaviors that led to his criminal charge. See Williams, 299 F.3d at 677 (commitment was appropriate even though defendant had “minimal history of actual violence” and a “relatively problem-free incarceration”); United States v. Ecker, 30 F.3d 966, 970 (8th Cir. 1994) (listing suggested factors in determining potential dangerousness). This court notes that the medical experts also agreed, and the district court acknowledged, that Hunt could be a candidate for conditional release into a controlled environment where he would be monitored under a prescribed regimen of psychiatric treatment. With that in mind, the court trusts that the Attorney General will continue its efforts to place Hunt in a suitable state facility and prepare annual reports 1 The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2- concerning his condition and the need for continued commitment. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 4246(d), 4247(e)(1)(B). The judgment is affirmed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. ______________________________ -3-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
