Robert Cornell v. Karen Anderson, No. 18-1038 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Gruender and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Prisoner case - Prisoner civil rights. Defendants' summary judgment affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-1038 ___________________________ Robert Allan Cornell lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Karen Anderson; Jana Hacker; Harbans Deol; John Baldwin; James McKinney; Dawn Fulton; Michael Kane; Edward O’Brien, MD; Dian Wilder; Robin Bagby; Kristine Weitzell lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines ____________ Submitted: November 13, 2018 Filed: November 26, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Iowa inmate Robert Allan Cornell appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Viewing the record in a light most favorable to Cornell, and drawing all reasonable inferences from it in his favor, we find that summary judgment was warranted. See Cullor v. Baldwin, 830 F.3d 830, 836 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review; to prove deliberate indifference, inmate must show that defendants knew of, but deliberately disregarded, serious medical need). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
