United States v. Gatwas, No. 17-3683 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseThe Eighth Circuit affirmed defendant's conviction for seven counts of aggravated identity theft stemming from his involvement in preparing personal income tax returns for his clients that obtained inflated refunds by falsely claiming dependents. The court held that the district court did not err in interpreting the term "uses, without lawful authority" under 18 U.S.C. 1028A(a)(1) where defendant knowingly used the names and social security numbers of falsely claimed dependents, including his own children, in committing wire fraud, and whether the minors "consented" to the use was irrelevant. Therefore, the district court did not err by denying defendant's motion for acquittal. The district court also did not abuse its discretion by rejecting a jury instruction incorporating defendant's interpretation of the statute.
Court Description: Loken, Author, with Benton and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. The district court did not err in interpreting the term "uses, without lawful authority" in finding defendant guilty on seven counts of aggravated identity theft under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1028A(a)(1); when defendant used the names and social security number of actual children, including his own, during and in relation to his wire fraud, whether the minor consented to the use was irrelevant; the court did not err in rejecting an instruction incorporating defendant's rejected interpretation of the statute.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.