Corey Rogers v. Steven Brouk, No. 17-2912 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Loken, Bowman and Gruender, Circuit Judges] Prisoner case - Prisoner civil rights. Defendants' summary judgment on plaintiff's excessive force, deliberate indifference to medical needs and sexual assault affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-2912 ___________________________ Corey Jemell Rogers lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Steven Brouk; John Layton; Donald Hale; John Schneedle; Cindy Griffith; Alan Earls lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________ Submitted: July 6, 2018 Filed: July 17, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Corey Rogers appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he raises claims of excessive force, deliberate indifference to his medical needs, and sexual assault. 1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment. See Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo; viewing record in light most favorable to nonmoving party). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
