Donald Frazier v. City of Pine Bluff, Arkansas, No. 17-2832 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Gruender, Kelly and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. Defendants' summary judgment affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-2832 ___________________________ Donald R. Frazier, also known as Donald Muhammad lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. City of Pine Bluff, Arkansas, A public body corporate; Mike Sweeney; Matthew Henry; Jeff Hubanks, Chief Individually and His Official Capacity lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff ____________ Submitted: August 2, 2018 Filed: August 13, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Donald Frazier appeals after the district court1 adversely granted summary judgment in his civil rights action. Upon careful de novo review, we conclude that, as to the issues raised on appeal, summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons stated by the district court. See Odom v. Kaizer, 864 F.3d 920, 921 (8th Cir. 2017) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo); see also Ahlberg v. Chrysler Corp., 481 F.3d 630, 638 (8th Cir. 2007) (stating that points not meaningfully argued on appeal were waived). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Brian S. Miller, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
