United States v. Adam Lamons, No. 17-2632 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Bowman and Benton, Circuit Judges] Civil Commitment Order. The district court's order civilly committing Lamons under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 4246 was supported by the unanimous opinions of the mental health staff, as well as Lamons' independent psychological examiner, that Lamons was suffering from a serious mental illness and met the criteria for Sec. 4246 commitment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-2632 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Adam Lamons lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield ____________ Submitted: March 7, 2018 Filed: March 21, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Adam Lamons, who was found incompetent to proceed with a hearing on a charged violation of supervised release conditions, appeals from the civil commitment order of the District Court.1 Under 18 U.S.C. § 4246, a person in federal custody but due for release may nevertheless be hospitalized if the court, after a hearing, finds by clear and convincing evidence that the prisoner is suffering from a mental disease or defect such that his release would be dangerous to the public. United States v. Williams, 299 F.3d 673, 676 (8th Cir. 2002). Lamons is presently confined at the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri (MCFP). On appeal from the order of commitment, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence justifying his continued hospitalization. We have reviewed the District Court’s factual determinations underlying the commitment decision for clear error, and we affirm. See id. (standard of review). The court’s order is supported by the unanimous opinions of mental health staff at MCFP and defense counsel’s independent psychological examiner. Those mental health professionals reported that Lamons was suffering from a serious mental illness with ongoing symptoms of psychosis and met the criteria for § 4246 commitment. They indicated, in part, that Lamons was experiencing symptoms of psychosis related to his mental illness and was unable to function on an unlocked housing unit; that he had a history of noncompliance or sporadic compliance with treatment, of misperceiving situations and responding with violence or aggression, of possessing weapons, and of using illicit substances; and that he had recently demonstrated aggressive and threatening behavior. See, e.g., United States v. Ecker, 30 F.3d 966, 970 (8th Cir.) (noting one doctor’s testimony of “major factors in determining potential dangerousness”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1064 (1994). The Attorney General must continue efforts to place Lamons in a suitable state facility and prepare annual reports concerning his condition and the need for 1 The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2- continued commitment. See 18 U.S.C. § 4246(d). In light of an updated report filed in the District Court indicating that as of August 2017, Lamons had shown progress in achieving stability, we trust that the government will act promptly to facilitate proceedings as warranted. See id. § 4247(e). We affirm the judgment and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. ______________________________ -3-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
