Heidi Ann Hill v. Commissioner, Social Security, No. 17-2531 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Shepherd, Kelly and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Social Security. The decision to deny benefits was supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. [ May 30, 2018
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-2531 ___________________________ Heidi Ann Hill lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________ Submitted: May 14, 2018 Filed: May 31, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Heidi Ann Hill appeals the order of the district court1 affirming the Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits. Based on de novo review of the record as a whole, this court agrees with the district court that substantial evidence supports the denial of benefits. See Harvey v. Colvin, 839 F.3d 714, 715 (8th Cir. 2016). To the extent Hill’s pro se brief challenges the ALJ’s credibility determination, we conclude his finding is entitled to deference, because it was supported by good reasons and substantial evidence. See Julin v. Colvin, 826 F.3d 1082, 1086 (8th Cir. 2016). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Katherine M. Menendez, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
