Gamada Hussein v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III, No. 17-2513 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Bowman and Benton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. Dismissal affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-2513 ___________________________ Gamada Ahmed Hussein, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III, U.S. Attorney General; U.S. Department of Justice; Christopher Wray,1 Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation; John Does, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________ Submitted: March 7, 2018 Filed: March 21, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ 1 Christopher Wray is substituted for his predecessor under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c). PER CURIAM. Gamada Hussein appeals the district court’s2 dismissal of his civil rights action for failure to state a claim and lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Upon de novo review, we conclude that even assuming the district court had jurisdiction to consider Hussein’s claim under the Privacy Act, the complaint failed to state a claim, and we affirm the dismissal of the remaining claims for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 2 The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Steven E. Rau, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
