Frederick Pitchford v. Joseph Boeckmann, No. 17-2504 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Bowman and Benton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. Dismissal affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-2504 ___________________________ Frederick L. Pitchford lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Joseph Boeckmann; Fred Thorne; David Henry Lofton; Jerry Eaves lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro ____________ Submitted: February 14, 2018 Filed: February 28, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Frederick L. Pitchford appeals the district court’s1 dismissal, without prejudice, of his pro se complaint. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms. 1 The Honorable D. P. Marshall, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Upon de novo review of Pitchford’s appellate arguments and the district court record, this court finds no basis for reversal. See Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (pre-service dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) is reviewed de novo). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
