United States v. Jakheeno Stewart, No. 17-2304 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Gruender, Bowman and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Anders case. The district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence. [ March 13, 2018
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-2304 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jakheeno Stewart lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock ____________ Submitted: March 9, 2018 Filed: March 14, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Jakheeno Stewart appeals from the sentence imposed by the District Court1 after he pleaded guilty to a gun charge. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has 1 The Honorable James M. Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. submitted a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), questioning the reasonableness of Stewart’s sentence. After review, we conclude that the district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence. There was no indication that it overlooked a relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553 factor or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007) (standard of review). We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. We affirm the sentence and grant counsel leave to withdraw. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
