United States v. Holt, No. 17-2170 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseThe Eighth Circuit affirmed defendant's sentence after he violated his terms of supervision. The court held that the district court properly considered the relevant factors and did not procedurally err in failing to explain its sentence. In this case, the district court discussed defendant's lengthy criminal history and his noncompliance to court orders. Therefore, the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant and his 24 month sentence was substantively reasonable.
Court Description: Per Curiam - Before Gruender, Melloy and Benton, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court adequately explained the basis for its sentencing decision in this proceeding to revoke defendant's supervised release; sentence imposed was not substantively unreasonable in light of defendant's continued criminality and drug use while on supervision. [ May 14, 2018
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.