Wenzel v. Storm, No. 17-2028 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseAfter Gary Wenzel was shot and killed by a police officer, Wenzel's family filed suit against the officer, alleging a claim under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for excessive force. The Eighth Circuit reversed the district court's denial of summary judgment based on the officer's claim of qualified immunity. The court held that, given the officer's knowledge of Wenzel's reputation of being aggressive and violent towards law enforcement officers, it was reasonable for the officer to believe that Wenzel posed an immediate threat of serious physical harm to him, notwithstanding the fact that the officer could see that Wenzel's hands were empty and the later-discovered fact that Wenzel was unarmed. In this case, a reasonable officer on the scene would have viewed Wenzel's indisputably aggressive approach as a precursor to a physical altercation, and the officer was required to make a split-second decision in an unpredictable and dangerous circumstance.
Court Description: Wollman, Author, with Shepherd and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. In action alleging defendant police officer used excessive force when he shot and killed plaintiffs' decedent, the district court erred in denying the officer's motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity as, even accepting as true plaintiffs' version of the incident, the officer's use of deadly force was reasonable under the circumstances as the officer could reasonably believe the deceased posed an immediate threat of serious physical harm, notwithstanding the fact that the officer could see the deceased's hands were empty.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.