KeOndra Chestang v. Missally Simpson, No. 17-1844 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Bowman and Benton, Circuit Judges] Prisoner case - Prisoner civil rights. Defendants' summary judgment affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-1844 ___________________________ KeOndra M. Chestang lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Missally S. Simpson, Correctional Officer, Varner SuperMax, originally named as Simpson, then Christy Simpson; Aleeshia Quinones, Nurse, Varner SuperMax (originally named as Aleshia Quinones); Teri Kennedy, Director of Nursing, Varner SuperMax (originally named as Kennedy); Lesa Jones, Assistant Director of Nursing, Varner SuperMax (originally named as Jones); Rory Griffin, Medical Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; Humphries, Owner, Correct Care Solutions (originally named as Humphrey); David Quillen, Sergeant, Varner SuperMax (originally named as Quillen); Ojiugo Iko, Doctor, Varner SuperMax (originally named as Iko) lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff ____________ Submitted: May 22, 2018 Filed: May 30, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Arkansas inmate KeOndra M. Chestang appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review of the summary judgment record, see Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review), we find no basis for overturning the district court’s thoughtful analysis of his claims of deliberate indifference.2 The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Patricia S. Harris, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 2 The new claims Chestang mentions are not properly before this court. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004). -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
