Nash v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, No. 17-1726 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseThe Eighth Circuit affirmed the denial of plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The court held that good reasons and substantial evidence supported the ALJ's determination that plaintiff's claimed limitations were not entirely credible. In this case, the ALJ considered plaintiff's alleged limitations, and substantial evidence supported the ALJ's residual functional assessment. Finally, the district court properly denied plaintiff's request for another hearing.
Court Description: Benton, Author, with Loken and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Social Security. Good reasons and substantial evidence supported the ALJ's determination that claimant's claimed limitations were not entirely credible; the ALJ considered claimant's alleged limitations and substantial evidence supports the ALJ's Residual Functional Capacity assessment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.