Gomez-Rivera v. Sessions, No. 17-1653 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseThe Eighth Circuit denied a petition for review of the BIA's decision upholding the IJ's denial of petitioner's applications for asylum and withholding of removal. The court held that the IJ and BIA applied the correct legal standard in requiring petitioner to show his social group or political opinion was the predominant reason for the persecution. The court held that petitioner's asylum claim failed because the evidence did not compel a finding that petitioner was persecuted on account of his social group or political opinion. Likewise, petitioner's application for withholding of removal also failed. In this case, a reasonable factfinder could conclude that gangs were targeting petitioner for general recruitment purposes and his relationship to his father, a former policeman, was merely "incidental or tangential" to that goal.
Court Description: Shepherd, Author, with Kelly and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. The IJ and BIA applied the correct legal standard in requiring petitioner to show his social group or political opinion must be "one central reason" for the persecution and not be simply incidental or tangential to another reason; on this record, the BIA did not err in concluding that petitioner's relationship to his father - a former policeman- was not a central reason for the alleged persecution, but rather incidental or tangential to general gang recruitment; the evidence was insufficient to establish an imputed political opinion or that the gangs were concerned with petiitioner's political beliefs. Judge Kelly, dissenting.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.