Jay Lamont v. United States, No. 17-1571 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Bowman and Benton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Federal Tort Claims Act. Summary judgment for the U.S. affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-1571 ___________________________ Jay D. Lamont, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, v. United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena ____________ Submitted: February 22, 2018 Filed: February 27, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Jay D. Lamont appeals the adverse grant of summary judgment entered by the district court1 in his Federal Tort Claims Act action. Upon de novo 1 The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beth review of the record, see Beaulieu v. Ludeman, 690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8th Cir. 2012), and consideration of Lamont’s arguments for reversal, we find no basis for overturning the grant of summary judgment. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
