United States v. Arthur Powell, No. 17-1349 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Gruender, Murphy and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. The parties agree defendant's burglary conviction under Minn. Stat. Sec. 609.582, subd. 1(a) no longer qualifies as a violent felony and, without this conviction, defendant cannot be classified as an armed career criminal; defendant's sentence is vacated, and the matter is remanded for resentencing.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-1349 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Arthur Lee Powell lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul ____________ Submitted: March 16, 2018 Filed: April 17, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, MURPHY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Arthur Lee Powell pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). At sentencing, the district court found that Powell was an armed career criminal and sentenced him to the mandatory minimum of 180 months’ imprisonment. See id. § 924(e)(1). Powell timely appealed his sentence. The Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”) imposes a sentencing enhancement on a felon in possession of a firearm if the defendant has three or more previous convictions for serious drug offenses or violent felonies. See id. At sentencing, the Government argued, and the district court agreed, that Powell’s prior convictions for first-degree burglary under Minn. Stat. § 609.582, subd. 1(a), simple robbery under Minn. Stat. § 609.24, and first-degree aggravated robbery under Minn. Stat. § 609.245, subd. 1 all qualified as violent felonies under the ACCA. The court determined that Powell’s sentencing guidelines range was 188 to 235 months, but it varied down to the 180-month mandatory minimum under the ACCA, noting that it would impose an even shorter sentence if the enhanced sentencing penalties of the ACCA did not apply. The district court found that Powell’s burglary conviction qualified as a predicate offense based on United States v. McArthur, 836 F.3d 931 (8th Cir. 2016). Since Powell’s sentencing, however, the McArthur decision was amended and superceded on panel rehearing. See United States v. McArthur, 850 F.3d 925 (8th Cir. 2017). We held that Minnesota third-degree burglary is not a predicate ACCA conviction. Id. at 939-40. The Government concedes that McArthur’s reasoning governs Powell’s first-degree burglary conviction. Thus, both parties agree that Powell’s burglary conviction no longer qualifies as a violent felony. With only two predicate offenses, Powell cannot be classified as an armed career criminal.1 Therefore, we vacate his sentence and grant the motion to remand for resentencing. ______________________________ 1 At the time of sentencing, this court had not yet considered whether Powell’s Minnesota aggravated robbery and Minnesota simple robbery convictions qualified as a violent felonies. Since then, however, we have determined that both offenses qualify as violent felonies. See United States v. Libby, 880 F.3d 1011, 1015-16 (8th Cir. 2018). -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
