Dorothy Petris v. Nancy A. Berryhill, No. 17-1163 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Loken and Colloton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Social Security. The ALJ's physical and mental residual functional capacity findings were supported by substantial, competent evidence on the record as a whole, and the denial of benefits is affirmed without further comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-1163 ___________________________ Dorothy E. Petris lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Commissioner of Social Security lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________ Submitted: December 27, 2017 Filed: January 2, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Dorothy E. Petris appeals the order of the district court1 affirming the Commissioner’s denial of supplemental security income. For reversal, Petris 1 The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. challenges the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) physical and mental residual function capacity findings. Having reviewed the parties’ submissions and the record before us, we conclude that the ALJ’s determinations are supported by substantial competent evidence on the record as a whole and that Petris’s arguments do not support reversal. See Wildman v. Astrue, 596 F.3d 959, 969 (8th Cir. 2010). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
