United States v. Sotelo-Valdovinos, No. 16-4101 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseThe Eighth Circuit dismissed defendants' appeals after they pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. The court held that the change of plea hearings and plea agreements confirmed that defendants knowingly and voluntarily accepted the plea agreements and waived their rights to appeal. In this case, defendants' sentences were well within the scope of their appeal waivers. Furthermore, the district court did not base its sentencing decision on one of the defendant's faith or religion, and enforcing the appeal waiver did not constitute a miscarriage of justice.
Court Description: Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Loken and Melloy, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. Defendants waived their right to appeal their sentences as part of their plea agreements, and their appeals are dismissed; the district court did not base its sentencing decision on defendant Sotelo-Valdovino's faith or religion, and enforcing his appeal waiver would not constitute a miscarriage of justice.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.