United States v. Fulk, No. 16-4088 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseThe Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's imposition of a ten year term of supervised release and a special travel condition where defendant pleaded guilty to failing to register as a sex offender. This was defendant's fourth conviction related to registry requirements. The court held that the ten year term of supervised release was reasonable because the district court discussed the specific factors that went into making its decisions. The court also held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in including the special travel condition in defendant's supervised release where the district court identified public safety concerns, including defendant's history of evading registry requirements, using false names, and lying to law enforcement officers. In this case, the district court balanced the need to encourage adherence to the registry requirements with a potential deprivation of liberty.
Court Description: Melloy, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Gruender, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Ten-year period of supervised release was not unreasonable as it was well within the advisory guidelines range of five years to life for this offense, and the court discussed the specific factors which went into making its decision; limits on defendant's travel were supported by his history of evading SONRA registration requirements, his use of false names and his lying to law enforcement; the record shows the district court balanced the need to encourage adherence to SORNA registration requirements with the potential deprivation of liberty and did not abuse its discretion in imposing the restrictions.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.