Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, No. 15-1682 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this Case
On remand from the United States Supreme Court, the Eighth Circuit reversed the district court's grant of summary judgment to defendants in light of Minnesota Majority v. Mansky, 849 F.3d 749, 753 (8th Cir. 2017).
Plaintiffs filed suit against the Minnesota Secretary of State and others, challenging a statute prohibiting the wearing of political insignia at a polling place, Minnesota Statute 211B.11. This court reversed the dismissal of defendants' as-applied First Amendment claim. On remand, the district court granted summary judgment for defendants and this court affirmed. The Supreme Court then reversed and remanded, holding that the statute violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.
Court Description: Per Curiam - Before Riley, Chief Judge, Loken and Benton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Election laws. Judges Loken and Benton issue this decision pursuant to 8th Cir. R. 47E. For the court's prior opinions in the matter, see Minnesota Majority v. Mansky, 708 F.3d 1051 (8th Cir. 2013) and Minnesota Majority v. Mansky, 849 F.3d 749 (8th Cir. 2017). On remand from the Supreme Court. Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, 138 S.Ct. 1876 (2018). In light of the Supreme Court' decision that the Minnesota statute in question violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, this court reverses the grant of summary judgment for the defendants and remands the matter for further proceedings.
This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on February 28, 2017.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.