Corina Bass v. Joliet Public School District, No. 13-1742 (7th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on March 26, 2014.
Download PDF
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Decided April 11, 2014 Before DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge No. 13 1742 CORINA BASS, Plaintiff Appellant, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 11 C 8136 v. JOLIET PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 86, Defendant Appellee. John W. Darrah, Judge. O R D E R On March 26, 2014, we issued our opinion affirming the district court s judgment dismissing appellant Corina Bass s challenge to a grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant Joliet Public School District No. 86. We found so little merit in the arguments that Bass raised on appeal that we issued an order to show cause to her No. 13-1742 2 attorney pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38. In that order, we asked the attorney to explain why he should not be sanctioned for bringing a frivolous appeal. The attorney, Steven H. Jesser, filed a timely response to our order. In his response, he acknowledges that this case lay close to the line, but he states that he believed in good faith that his client s case was not sanctionably frivolous. He notes in this connection that his review of the record indicated that she was treated differently, and less favorably, than a comparable male employee of the district. Finally, he apologizes to the court for any miscalculation he may have made. We are satisfied from his explanation that sanctions would be inappropriate in this situation. We therefore DISCHARGE the rule to show cause and we instruct the Clerk of this court to forward a copy of this order to Illinois s Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, so that its file will contain a complete and accurate record of the disposition of the order in this court.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.