United States v. Winczuk, No. 22-1190 (1st Cir. 2023)
Annotate this Case
The First Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court sentencing Defendant to forty-five years of imprisonment in connection with his plea of guilty to one count each of attempted sexual exploitation of a minor and committing a felony involving a minor while required to register as a sex offender, holding that there was no error.
The district court's sentence was composed of a thirty-five-year mandatory minimum on the attempted sexual exploitation of a minor count based on two prior state convictions relating to "the sexual exploitation of children" and a ten-year consecutive mandatory minimum on the remaining count. On appeal, Defendant argued that the thirty-five-year mandatory minimum did not apply because the phrase "relating to the sexual exploitation of children" means only the production of child pornography. The First Circuit affirmed, holding (1) the plain text of "relating to the sexual exploitation of children" unambiguously refers to any criminal sexual conduct involving children; and (2) Defendant's remaining arguments failed.
The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on May 5, 2023.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.