Mu v. Omni Hotels Management Corp., No. 16-2293 (1st Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on February 7, 2018.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit _____________________ No. 16-2293 HENRY MU, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. OMNI HOTELS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a/k/a Omni Hotels, Defendant, Appellee, JOHN DOES 1-20, Defendants. _____________________ No. 16-2442 HENRY MU, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. OMNI HOTELS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a/k/a Omni Hotels; JOHN DOES 1-20, Defendants, Appellees. __________________ Before Howard, Chief Judge, Torruella and Barron, Circuit Judges. __________________ ORDER OF COURT Entered: March 19, 2018 We deny the petition for review. With respect to petitioners' arguments concerning the standard of care, we note that, without suggesting any have merit, they fail for lack of prejudice because the record did contain sufficient evidence -- particularly given that expert testimony was not required -- to support reasonable inferences rendering summary judgment inappropriate with regard to the standard of care. Most critically, record evidence established both that prior to the fight Mu urged an employee who had just seen a fight amongst the rowdy group of recent evictees and the group acting aggressively towards a third party to "get some help," but was told it was "not [the employee's] problem," and that Mu later urged another Omni employee "to do something" about the rowdy group "coming in and out" of the lobby, including to "kick them out," "call security" and/or "report [them] to the police." This, on its own, gives rise to a dispute of material fact regarding Omni's adherence to the proper standard of care. By the Court: /s/ Margaret Carter, Clerk cc: Hon. Patricia A. Sullivan Hanorah Tyer-Witek, Clerk, United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island Jesse W. Duarte Geoffrey Williams Millsom Brenna Anatone Force Douglas Jay Emanuel
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
