US v. Lanza-Vazquez, US v. Astacio-Espino, US v. Rivera-Carrasquillo, No. 14-1582 (1st Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on August 2, 2019.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 14-1582 14-1631 14-1715 17-1317 17-1729 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. LUIS D. RIVERA-CARRASQUILLO, a/k/a Danny KX, a/k/a Danny Vorki; EDWIN BERNARD ASTACIO-ESPINO, a/k/a Bernard, a/ka Bernal; RAMÓN LANZA-VÁZQUEZ, a/k/a Ramoncito, Defendants, Appellants. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court, issued on August 2, 2019, is amended as follows: On page 28, lines 1-5, replace A necessary element for a RICO-conspiracy conviction is that "the defendant agree[d] to commit or actually commit[ted] two or more acts of racketeering activity." United States v. Shifman, 124 F.3d 31, 38 (1st Cir. 1997); see also id. at 35 (discussing the other elements). with "RICO conspiracy counts 'require[] at least two acts of racketeering activity.'" United States v. Tavares, 844 F.3d 46, 54 (1st Cir. 2016) (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 1961(5)).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
