United States v. DiRosa, No. 13-1643 (1st Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his sentence and conviction for wire fraud. The court concluded that there was more than sufficient evidence from which a jury could have reasonably concluded that the government proved all of the essential elements of wire fraud; the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the testimony of two individuals that defendant had solicited in the past; the district court did not err in allowing the victim to testify at length as to statements made by defendant's associate during their meetings; and defendant's within-Guidelines sentence of 57 months was substantively reasonable. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.