Mills v. Calero, No. 13-1415 (1st Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 13-1415 DAVID MILLS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. LYNNE CALERO, DOUGLAS MILLETT, MARY C. MAYHEW, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. John A. Woodcock, Jr., U.S. District Judge] Before Lynch, Chief Judge, Stahl and Howard, Circuit Judges. Joseph M. Baldacci on brief for appellant. Thomas A. Knowlton on brief for appellees. October 23, 2013 PER CURIAM. We have carefully reviewed the briefs on appeal and considered the appellant's arguments. The district court was plainly correct to dismiss the complaint. Mills's arguments are based on a misapprehension of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, see D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983), and of issue preclusion, and are without merit. For the reasons set forth in the district court's order, Mills v. Calero, No. 1:11-cv-00470 (D. Me. Mar. 7, 2013), we summarily affirm. 1st Cir. R. 27.0(c). -2- See

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.