Broderick v. PNC Financial Services Group, No. 13-1158 (1st Cir. 2014)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 13-1158 JENNIFER W. BRODERICK, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., d/b/a PNC MORTGAGE, d/b/a PNC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, d/b/a PNC BANK, d/b/a PNC BANCORP, d/b/a PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES, d/b/a PNC, Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Joseph L. Tauro, U.S. District Judge] Before Lynch, Chief Judge, Torruella and Kayatta, Circuit Judges. Valeriano Diviacchi and Diviacchi Law Office, on brief for appellant. Matthew M. O'Leary, Patrick T. Voke and LeClairRyan, A Professional Corporation, on brief for appellee. May 23, 2014 Per Curiam. Plaintiff-Appellant Jennifer W. Broderick ("Broderick") alleged a Massachusetts state-law claim for unfair and deceptive trade practices in connection with the origination of a "no income verification" home mortgage loan. She now appeals from the district court's dismissal of her amended complaint as time-barred under the relevant statute of limitations. Having thoroughly reviewed the record and Broderick's brief on appeal, we affirm the dismissal of her amended complaint substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. We add that, in view of the final judgment in Broderick's previous civil action, Broderick v. PNC Mortgage Corp., No. 1:11-cv-10047-WGY (D. Mass.), her claim is likely barred under the doctrine of claim preclusion. See, e.g., Silva v. City of New Bedford, 660 F.3d 76, 78-81 (1st Cir. 2011). AFFIRMED. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
