Deka Int'l S.A. Luxemborg v. Genzyme Corp., No. 13-1085 (1st Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on June 5, 2014.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 13-1085 IN RE: GENZYME CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION, DEKA INTERNATIONAL S.A. LUXEMBOURG; CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL AS ADMINISTERING AUTHORITY OF THE LOTHIAN PENSION FUND; GOVERNMENT OF GUAM RETIREMENT FUND, Plaintiffs, Appellants, VIVIAN OH, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated; JON RAHN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; GENZYME INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS, Plaintiffs, v. GENZYME CORPORATION; HENRI A. TERMEER; DAVID P. MEEKER; MICHAEL S. WYZGA; ALLISON LAWTON; MARK R. BAMFORTH; GEOFFREY MCDONOUGH, Defendants, Appellees. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on June 5, 2014, is amended as follows: On page 20, line 20: replace "defendants's misleading" with "defendants' allegedly misleading" allegedly On page 23, line 10: replace "defendants earlier positive" with "defendants' earlier positive" On page 23, line 16: replace "plaintiffs' preferred" with "plaintiffs would have preferred" would have On page 25, line 16: replace "Geel and Allston facility" with "Geel and Allston facilities" On page 29, line 13: replace "Plaintiffs' also assert" with "Plaintiffs also assert" On page 33, line 15: replace "post judgment" with "postjudgment" On page 36, line 18: replace "abuse it's discretion" with "abuse its discretion" -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
