Freeman v. Town of Hudson, No. 12-1356 (1st Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on April 15, 2013.

Download PDF

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 12-1356 CHARLES FREEMAN AND DANIELA FREEMAN, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. TOWN OF HUDSON, TOWN OF HUDSON CONSERVATION COMMITTEE, TOWN OF HUDSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, THOMAS CRIPPEN, DAVID STEPHENS, RICHARD BRAGA, DEBBIE CRAIG, PAUL BYRNE, DAVID ESTEVES, JEFF WOOD, THOMAS THORBURN, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND JOSEPH BELLINO, Defendants, Appellees. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on April 15, 2013 is amended as follows: Page 7, line 5: "Atlantic" is corrected to "Atl.". Page 7, lines 7-8: "[n]on-conclusory factual allegations must . . . be treated as true." is corrected to "[n]on-conclusory factual allegations . . . must [] be treated as true.".April 17, 2013 Page 8, line 6: "documents," is corrected to "documents". Page 9, lines 9-10: "'consider matters of public record'" is corrected to "consider 'matters of public record'". Page 9, line 22: "South" is corrected to "S.". Page 9, line 24: "Astoria Federal Sav. and Loan Ass'n" is corrected to "Astoria Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n". Page 10, line 14: "Intern." is corrected to "Int'l". Page 12, line 2: "constitution" is corrected to "Constitution". Page 12, line 12: "tortfeasor." is corrected to "tortfeasor . . . .". Page 14, line 11: "Village" is corrected to "Vill.". Page 16, line 21: "interest" is corrected to "interests". Page 16, line 22: "(internal quotations and citations omitted)" is deleted. Page 17, line 19: "46" is corrected to "45". Page 17, line 20: "state" is inserted between "relevant" and "statutes". Page 17, line 22: "(internal quotation marks and citations omitted)" is inserted after "(1st Cir. 1990)". Page 18, line 9: "a" is corrected to "the". Page 19, line 12: "'so shocking" is corrected to "so 'shocking".

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.