Pedro Ramon Lopez, et al., Petitioners, v. Office of Thrift Supervision, Respondent, 70 F.3d 638 (D.C. Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 70 F.3d 638 (D.C. Cir. 1995) Sept. 19, 1995

Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge; SENTELLE and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This case was considered on the record of the Office of Thrift Supervision and on the briefs of counsel. See D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36(b). It is therefore

ORDERED that the petition for review be denied for the reasons set forth in the order of the Acting Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision.

The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41(a) (1).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.