Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.arthur J. Toegemann, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. City of Cranston, et al., Defendants, Appellees, 66 F.3d 306 (1st Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseArthur J. Toegemann on brief pro se.
William F. Holt, Asst. City Sol., on brief for appellee City of Cranston.
Seth E. Bowerman and Hanson, Curran, Parks & Whitman on brief for appellees Saratoga Hospital and Butler Hospital.
Joseph A. Keough, Jr., Francis X. Flaherty and Wynn & Wynn on brief for appellee Peter Palombo, Jr.
Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, SELYA and STAHL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs on appeal, we are persuaded that the district court's order was fully justified by the plaintiff's history of filing meritless actions against many of the named defendants. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See Local Rule 27.1. Costs to appellees.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
